Student ID:______________________________Examination Date:_____________ General Core
Course:______________________________
Maximum score possible: 15pts Graders:
Scores may range from 5, 4, 3, 2, to 1 (Decimal Value May Be Used).
SCORE |
EVALUATION
CRITERIA |
SCORE
OF 5- VERY
STRONG |
SCORE
OF 3- AVERAGE |
SCORE
1— WEAK |
|
ORGANIZATION AND FORMAT |
Organization is a logical
progression of ideas and is succinct, unified and completer. Has an
introductory paragraph that prepares the reader for the argument that
follows. Demonstrates skill sentence fluency. No grammatical/spelling errors.
Adheres to APA format with a minimum
of two in-text citations.
(Reference page included). |
There is a logical progression of
ideas and is reasonably complete, although minor lapses many be present. A
few grammatical/spelling errors. Does not consistently adhere to APA format. Demonstrates reasonable sentence
fluency. |
One or more major lapses in the
logical progression ideas is/are evident. Frequent- to-many
grammatical/spelling errors. APA format not apparent. |
|
|
Comments: |
|
|
|
KNOWLEDGE BASE |
Responds adequately to all
components of the question in the manner requested, for example, discuss or
describe. Answer is equivalent at 3-4
full, double-spaced, typed pages. Any and all components of the question
are explicitly and thoroughly answered. Generalized statements are not used
without citations to support. Citations exceed the minimum expectation for
documentation. |
Part of the answer is not provided
in the form requested, for example, discuss or describe. Answer equivalent to
2-3, double-spaced, typed pages. Answer is not always clear. One or two
question components are sketchily addressed. Meets the minimum requirements
for documentation. Few statements given without referencing. Few opinions
given without supporting documentation. |
Answer is not provided in form
requested, for example, discuss or describe. One page, double-spaced answer.
Answer does not address question or is too general. Does not meet the minimum
requirements for documentation. Unsubstantiated generalizations used. |
|
|
Comments: |
|
|
|
ANALYTICAL |
Shows information learned was
processed through one’s schema. Has ability to do more than regurgitate the
information/knowledge learned. Demonstrates writer’s
awareness of subject’s complexities. Demonstrates significant reflection and
analysis. Answer includes/addresses several current and/or significant
issues. |
Simply regurgitates information,
but does it accurately. Provides critical reflection and/or analysis, but
does not contain sufficient depth. Answer addresses one current and/or
significant issue. |
Is unable to simply regurgitate
accurately. No apparent critical reflection; shows awareness of subject, but
not its relationship to anything else. Answer does not address any current
and/or significant issue. |
|
|
Comments: |
|
|
|
TOTAL SCORE: |
Overall Comments: |
|
|
|
Grader’s Printed Name: |
Grader’s Signature: |
Date Graded: |
|